[pushed] c++: Fix comparison of fn() and ns::fn() [PR90711]

Message ID 20200330211539.7951-1-jason@redhat.com
State New
Headers show
Series
  • [pushed] c++: Fix comparison of fn() and ns::fn() [PR90711]
Related show

Commit Message

Iain Buclaw via Gcc-patches March 30, 2020, 9:15 p.m.
The resolution of CWG issue 1321 clarified that when deciding whether two
expressions involving template parameters are equivalent, two dependent
function calls where the function is named with an unqualified-id are
considered to be equivalent if the name is the same, even if unqualified
lookup finds different sets of functions.  We were wrongly treating
qualified-ids the same way, so that EXISTS and test::EXISTS were considered
to be equivalent even though they are looking up the name in different
scopes.  This also causes a mangling bug, but I don't think it's safe to fix
that for GCC 10; this patch just fixes the comparison.

Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk/9.

gcc/cp/ChangeLog
2020-03-30  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>

	PR c++/90711
	* tree.c (cp_tree_equal) [CALL_EXPR]: Compare KOENIG_LOOKUP_P.
	(called_fns_equal): Check DECL_CONTEXT.
---
 gcc/cp/tree.c                                 | 14 ++++++-
 .../g++.dg/template/dependent-name14.C        | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name14.C


base-commit: 1cb1986cb596336e688c079b821205ec212a46a3
-- 
2.18.1

Patch

diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.c b/gcc/cp/tree.c
index b85967e1bfa..a2172dea0d8 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/tree.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/tree.c
@@ -2464,6 +2464,8 @@  is_overloaded_fn (tree x)
 tree
 dependent_name (tree x)
 {
+  /* FIXME a dependent name must be unqualified, but this function doesn't
+     distinguish between qualified and unqualified identifiers.  */
   if (identifier_p (x))
     return x;
   if (TREE_CODE (x) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR)
@@ -3581,6 +3583,15 @@  called_fns_equal (tree t1, tree t2)
       if (name1 != name2)
 	return false;
 
+      /* FIXME dependent_name currently returns an unqualified name regardless
+	 of whether the function was named with a qualified- or unqualified-id.
+	 Until that's fixed, check that we aren't looking at overload sets from
+	 different scopes.  */
+      if (is_overloaded_fn (t1) && is_overloaded_fn (t2)
+	  && (DECL_CONTEXT (get_first_fn (t1))
+	      != DECL_CONTEXT (get_first_fn (t2))))
+	return false;
+
       if (TREE_CODE (t1) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR)
 	targs1 = TREE_OPERAND (t1, 1);
       if (TREE_CODE (t2) == TEMPLATE_ID_EXPR)
@@ -3677,7 +3688,8 @@  cp_tree_equal (tree t1, tree t2)
       {
 	tree arg1, arg2;
 	call_expr_arg_iterator iter1, iter2;
-	if (!called_fns_equal (CALL_EXPR_FN (t1), CALL_EXPR_FN (t2)))
+	if (KOENIG_LOOKUP_P (t1) != KOENIG_LOOKUP_P (t2)
+	    || !called_fns_equal (CALL_EXPR_FN (t1), CALL_EXPR_FN (t2)))
 	  return false;
 	for (arg1 = first_call_expr_arg (t1, &iter1),
 	       arg2 = first_call_expr_arg (t2, &iter2);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name14.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name14.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..52d2e72be35
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/dependent-name14.C
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ 
+// PR c++/90711
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+namespace test {
+    void EXISTS(int);
+}
+
+template<typename... ARGS>
+struct stub_void {
+    typedef void type;
+};
+template<typename... ARGS>
+using stub_void_t = typename stub_void<ARGS...>::type;
+
+#if !defined(SUPPRESS)
+template<typename O, typename = void>
+struct has_to_string {
+    static constexpr bool value = false;
+};
+
+template<typename O>
+struct has_to_string<O, stub_void_t<decltype(EXISTS(O{}))>> {
+    static constexpr bool value = true;
+};
+#endif
+
+template<typename O, typename = void>
+struct has_std_to_string {
+    static constexpr bool value = false;
+};
+
+template<typename O>
+struct has_std_to_string<O, stub_void_t<decltype(test::EXISTS(O{}))>> {
+    static constexpr bool value = true;
+};
+
+static_assert (has_std_to_string<int>::value, "");
+